top of page

Lightweight Solar Panels: Types, Pros & Cons for Commercial Rooftops

A Complete Guide to Glue-On Solar, Low-Profile Mounting Systems & Vertical Bifacial Panels


Many commercial rooftops were never designed to carry the weight of conventional solar installations. Once racking systems and ballast blocks are included, traditional setups can exceed 25 kg per square meter — creating structural challenges for older buildings, logistics centers, industrial halls, and green roofs.


Lightweight solar systems solve this problem by significantly reducing roof load while maintaining strong energy performance. Today, three main approaches dominate the market:


  1. Adhesive-mounted (glue-on) solar

  2. Low-profile, ballast-reduced mounting systems

  3. Vertical bifacial solar panels


Each solution addresses structural constraints differently. The key is choosing the system that matches your building’s load capacity, climate exposure, and long-term energy strategy.



Who Should Consider Lightweight Rooftop Solar?


• Sustainability managers driving decarbonization targets

• Facility managers responsible for flat roof assets

• Energy advisors assessing structural capacity

• Architects planning retrofit projects

• Solar installers working with load-restricted roofs

• Commercial property owners with aging or lightweight structures


  1. Glue-On Solar Panels (Adhesive-Mounted PV Systems)


How They Work

Glue-on solar panels — also known as bonded or adhesive-mounted systems — eliminate traditional aluminum racking. Instead, lightweight modules are secured directly to the roof surface using structural adhesives or industrial bonding systems.


Most applications rely on thin-film technologies such as:


  • Cadmium telluride (CdTe)

  • Copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS)

  • Amorphous silicon (a-Si)


Thin-film modules are significantly thinner and more flexible than conventional crystalline panels, making them suitable for weight-sensitive surfaces like metal roofs, PVC membranes, or trapezoidal sheet roofing.


Advantages

• Extremely low structural impact

• No roof penetration

• Fast installation

• Minimal wind uplift due to flat profile

• Clean architectural integration


Limitations

• Lower efficiency per square meter

• Potential heat buildup due to limited airflow

• Semi-permanent installation (removal may affect membranes)

• More complex inverter and system design considerations


Examples for Glue-On Solutions:





  1. Low-Profile Rack Systems (Low Load Solar Mounting Systems)


How do they work

Low-profile systems reduce weight while still using crystalline modules. Instead of heavy ballast blocks and steep tilt angles, these systems rely on aerodynamic engineering and optimized geometry.


Weight reduction is achieved through:

  • Lower tilt angles (typically 10–20°)

  • Wind-deflecting backplates

  • Interconnected module fields that distribute loads

  • Limited ballast in specific roof zones


This approach balances energy density with reduced structural load.


General Principles

Low-profile solar mounting systems reduce weight through three core engineering principles:


1. Lower Tilt Angles

Instead of steep 25–35° angles, these systems often use 10–20° inclinations. Lower angles reduce wind uplift forces.


2. Aerodynamic Backplates

Metal back sheets or side shields prevent wind from lifting the modules from behind.


3. Connected Module Fields

Modules are linked together in continuous rows and interconnected blocks, increasing structural stability and distributing loads across the array.


Some systems use minimal ballast only in roof edge zones. Others rely almost entirely on structural design rather than heavy concrete blocks. Tilt angles vary depending on manufacturer and module technology. Thin-film systems may use shallower angles, while crystalline systems often use slightly steeper configurations to optimize direct irradiation.


Advantages

• Higher energy yield per square meter compared to thin-film

• Reduced weight compared to traditional racking

• Proven crystalline module performance

• Improved airflow and temperature management


Limitations

• Requires structural approval and load analysis

• Edge zones may still concentrate weight

• More complex installation planning

• Still dependent on some ballast in many cases


Examples for Low Profile Solutions:



  1. Vertical Bifacial Solar Panels for Flat Roofs


A Different Structural Approach

Vertical solar panels take a fundamentally different approach. Instead of tilting modules toward the sun, they are installed upright — typically in an east-west orientation — generating power from both sides.


These systems use bifacial crystalline modules that capture:

  • Morning sun on the east-facing side

  • Afternoon sun on the west-facing side

  • Reflected light (albedo) from the roof surface


Because the panels stand vertically, they experience:

  • Minimal wind uplift

  • Reduced snow accumulation

  • Lower aerodynamic stress


The mounting structure can therefore remain significantly lighter than traditional tilted systems.


Advantages

• Very low aerodynamic load

• Even energy generation throughout the day

• Strong performance in snowy or windy climates

• Compatible with green roofs

• Improved self-consumption profile in commercial settings


Limitations

• Requires sufficient spacing between rows

• Lower midday production peak compared to south-tilted arrays

• Still less familiar in some markets


Examples for Vertical Solar Solutions:



Choosing the Right Lightweight Solar Solution


Lightweight solar is no longer a niche category. It is becoming essential for unlocking solar potential in retrofit-heavy markets across Europe and other mature solar regions.


The decision framework should consider:


  • Available structural load capacity

  • Wind and snow conditions

  • Roof surface type

  • Energy consumption profile

  • Long-term asset strategy


When Structural Load Is the Real Bottleneck


For many commercial properties, roof load is the single largest barrier to solar adoption. Traditional systems may require reinforcement, engineering upgrades, or may be rejected altogether.


This makes them particularly relevant in markets such as DACH, the Netherlands, Scandinavia, France, the UK, Italy, and Australia — where retrofit demand is accelerating under tightening energy regulations.




bottom of page